McCain's Brain
I'm really getting the sense that John McCain (a man I respected and actually voted for in the 2000 election) is losing his facilities and trying not to let anyone notice it.
There have been so many little slip-ups. He was publicly corrected by Joe Lieberman for saying that Iran was training al-Qaida when the former is predominantly Shiite and the terrorist groups is primarily Sunni, a pairing that hate each other at least as much as they hate us. Lieberman whispered in his ear and he corrected his statement... and then went on to assert the link again in other interviews, one as early as 12 hours later.
This week he asserted that we had drawn our forces down to "pre-surge levels" (we have not, we have over 20,000 more troops in Iraq than before the surge, and even after the draw downs complete in July or August we're projected to have over 10,000 more people there than we had in January 2007 (when the surge was announced). When called on it he behaved as though it was ridiculous that anyone would assert he had said such a thing... but it's on video.
There are others. Watching him speak, I get the clear sense of my grandfather in his later years, still trying to be the vibrant, confident man he was in his 60s but just not quite pulling it off.
I hate to bring this up, because the McCain campaign and the media have portrayed ageism in this campaign as akin to sexism and racism, but the thing is, there's a difference. Gender and race have little to do with a person's abilities. A black man or a woman of either race has just as much chance of being a great leader as a white man (and a much higher chance than the current white man in the job).
Whereas we all know that our faculties diminish with age. Anyone in their 40s or over who suddenly finds themselves reaching for the reading glasses in order to enjoy some light fiction, or who spends an entire day walking gingerly after a moderate game of tennis knows that our bodies stop providing us with the same level of service they once did.
Those like me who find increasingly that finding the word we want is difficult (and let me tell you how much fun that is, while writing a blog entry, knowing there's a word or phrase that conveys exactly what I'm thinking and being unable to conjure it up) know that our minds are just as disloyal as our bodies.
John McCain seems to be in pretty good shape for a man his age... but the combination of having lost a step or two mentally combined with his reported stubborn streak (apparently not being terribly willing to listen to opposing viewpoints, and where have we seen THAT behavior recently?) make for a bad combination in a President.
Anyway, I'm going to finish this with a video from YouTube. I'm still not sure posting this is a good idea, because we've all seen many examples of these sorts of videos cobbled together from a lifetime of public speaking in order to make a perfectly competent politician look silly.
Still, though, this one has several examples in it that I've seen in context, and they're just as bad.
Take it with as many grains of salt as you need. (These are two parts of essentially the same video, or at least two different videos by the same production company, "Brave New Films").
Liam.
2 Comments:
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
Given McCain's views on immigration, the environment, that he voted against the Bush tax cuts before he voted for them, suggest he is basically a democrat in republican's clothing. He even considered switching parties in 04 and may put Lieberman on the ticket. McCain doesn't cowtow to the conservative base.
The reality of McCain's age is two-fold. Pay particular attention to Veep choice and resist bringing up the age thing... lest McCain's opponent's 'youth and inexperience' should throw the electorate.
Chin up, even if the Dems lose; they win.
Saturday, May 31, 2008 10:41:00 AM
Lieberman on the ticket with McCain would be interesting, a man you describe as a Democrat in Republican clothing with a VP who's a Republican in Democratic clothing.
My problem is that I respected McCain in 2000. I've said many times (probably on this blog as well) that I voted for him in 2000 (my frustration that year was palpable, because of the "final four" that year, my choice in order of preference was McCain, Bradley, Gore, Bush. Then it came down to Gore v. Bush, which kinda sucked, and then Bush won).
But my problem is that I really don't know who to vote for if Clinton wins today or at some point before the end of the Democratic convention and manages to steal the election. I don't like her, not a bit. In spite of being called "far left" by the Fox News pundits, the fact is that she and her husband have consistently been centrist, and some have pretty convincingly argued that they're significantly to the right of Nixon and Goldwater and the classical Republicans I grew up with.
Which isn't in and of itself a bad thing, I'm not sure why I brought it up. A classical Republican (truly for smaller government, truly for fiscal responsibility, truly for the things the Republican party pays lip service to while going whole hog in the other direction) is perhaps what we most need now.
But... Hillary Clinton is NOT what we need now, because she (like the President) seems to be for a BIGGER Executive Branch, at least in terms of power. She seems to subscribe to the same "Imperial" style executive branch Bush does.
But I'm also looking back to the last few years of Reagan's White House, a time when although we didn't know it then, it's pretty well documented now that he was well into the Alzheimer's that was to take the rest of him from us shortly after he left office. And that was in a time of predominent peace.
McCain seems to me to have lost a step. That's generous; he seems to me to have lost about 4 steps. The two possibilities I see are:
1) He's showing some early signs of senility and/or age related slowing, and I don't think we need a President who forgets today the things he agreed to yesterday, which seems to describe McCain's public speaking lately.
2) He's completely switched his mode from the "Straight Talk Express" of 2000 to ultra-politician "Tell 'em what they want to hear" mode that's so much more common, and he's just less adept at it than others are, but even if that's the case, it just means we really don't know where he stands on anything.
So if Hillary Clinton manages to wheedle and cajole and ooze her way into the nomination, I really don't know who to vote for. Each time I look at either of the two (McCain/Clinton), I think the other is the lesser of the two evils.
Hey, we might actually have the first election in my life time where there really isn't a lesser of two evils on the ballot and I really do feel comfortable staying home and not voting, because I honestly have no interest in seeing one of them win over the other.
Liam.
Saturday, May 31, 2008 5:54:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home