A place for Liam to post essays, comments, diatribes and rants on life in general.

Those fond of Liam's humor essays, they have been moved here.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

"Disrespectful"

Here's a clip from C-Span highlighting one of John McCain's latest ads.

The thing is, I can't decide if it's racist or sexist, but it's at least one, possibly.

The voiceover says that Obama and Biden "dismissed" her as good looking. This is based on Joe Biden's comment "What are the difference between me and Senator McCain's VP pick? Well, for one thing, she's much better looking." It wasn't dismissive at all, it was self deprecating humor.

Then it says "they accused her of being a liar". Well, those are shoes which fit both Gov. Palin and Sen. McCain quite well, thank you.

But the voiceover goes on to say "How disrespectful."

This is the part that I can't decide as to whether it's racist, sexist or both. First, the argument for racism: Can you see this same ad being leveled at a white male candidate? Or would they have used a different word, like "rude" or "condescending"? "Disrespectful" is something a lesser is to their superior. A child is disrespectful to a parent. A subordinate is disrespectful to a boss. And dare I say it, a slave is disrespectful to the master. To claim disrespect, you are essentially claiming that one is DUE respect from the other.

Now, why do I say it may be sexist? Because if it is honestly not racist then it is playing on our belief that men should be "respectful" to women, based on the assumption that women are too delicate or weak to handle the full force of the male personality. So if the ad is not claiming disrespect because he is black and she is white, then it is claiming it because he is male and she, female.

All in all, I find the ad very distasteful to watch.

Take a look and tell me if you disagree.

Liam.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting interpretation.

My thought was that the ad says "Don't bash the woman." (Notice, it keeps Palin front and center in the media.)

You know, that phrase has several uses. It plays into garnering sympathy for Palin, and it takes the focus off of issues and McCain. But there is another possible use....

At first while reading your blog, I disagreed with the racist angle, but now I'm not so sure. It may not have been deliberate, but it also plays into an old and disturbing racism, a particular racial paranoia. The mental image of a black man disrespecting a white woman is a racist fear that has not necessarily gone away with time. The fears might not affect those already decided on Obama, but it might send a subliminal message and get those with a degree of racism to get out there and vote.

Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:38:00 AM

 
Blogger Liam said...

Yeah, that was my thinking as well.

You don't have to be overt in order to trigger racist tendencies in those who are so inclined.

Recall the Harold Ford ad in Tennessee in 2006, in which they had a white floozy saying "Harold, call me!", which takes a lot of the credit for Ford losing as it brought up images of miscengenation.

Either way, though, the ad is at least one of the two, and yet done subtly enough that most people probably won't pick up on that, but will merely ignore it or be fired up by it (depending on their level of sexist/racist attitudes).

Liam.

Sunday, September 14, 2008 11:57:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

Career Education