A place for Liam to post essays, comments, diatribes and rants on life in general.

Those fond of Liam's humor essays, they have been moved here.

Thursday, November 08, 2012

American Exceptionalism

Someone please explain to me what is meant by "American exceptionalism" and why it matters so much to so many that we TALK about it?

To me, we either ARE exceptional or we AREN'T. If we ARE, that's great, and we don't need to talk about it. If we AREN'T, no amount of telling ourselves we are is going to change that.

So why get upset when one politician or another fails to use the term? We should always be working to be the best we can be. To me, even if we ARE exceptional, labeling ourselves as such just sows the seeds of resting on our laurels and perhaps losing the very thing we prize, because we've now told ourselves we have it and stop striving for it.

It's a buzz word. It means nothing. And when someone tells me "This is part of what group doesn't like about politician , because he doesn't talk about American exceptionalism", this tells me that group has their priorities completely wrong.

***

(In response to Gordon Goldberg, who said "What's actually sad is that those who use the term most seem to think it has something to do with American *superiority* -- but it doesn't. It has to do simply with the idea that America, being the first of the "new countries", is exceptional (as in "different") from the "old" countries of Europe.")

Gordon: That's a great point. I have much less of a problem with it if we want to use it in that context, but precisely because in that context we're NOT claiming to be BETTER.

If people wanted to talk about American Uniqueness (which is true, there are few countries in the world which are EXACTLY like any other, and so each has its own uniqueness), I'd be OK.

But you're right, implicit in the term "exceptionalism" (and what I always assumed it meant based on the context) seems to be the unstated term "excellence" as in not that America is exceptional (different) but that it is exceptionally excellent.

I really don't want to get into an argument over whether this is the best country in the world, because it's a hot button topic and if you discuss it honestly, you get a lot of blowback from people who insist you "hate America".

I just think that I'm not a big fan of going around telling people how good I am. If I'm a truly good person, most people will see that. If I'm not, telling people I am won't make it so.

2 Comments:

Blogger Ross said...

One of the things I found when I went searching for American Exceptionalism (after your FB post) was this chapter 1 from a 1996 book. Apparently one of the very unique things about America, from Europe's point of view, is that it has no socialism. And another is that it has the labels Liberalism and Conservatism dead backwards.

Friday, November 09, 2012 10:52:00 AM

 
Blogger Liam said...

Thanks. I disagree with the characterization that we have "no socialism" (I know it wasn't yours, I'm disagreeing with the book).

Obviously, we have some socialist institutions. Most of our infrastructure. Our military. Our government, court and police systems. Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. All socialized, meaning they belong to everyone and are paid for by everyone.

Why do I think this is an important distinction to make? Because if you buy the idea that we have NO socialism, then you can make all sorts of "slippery slope, let's not start down that path" arguments any time anything additional (such as health care for everyone) gets bandied about. The truth is, we have much LESS socialism than throughout most of Europe, but it's still a matter of where on the sliding scale we exist, not being at one polar end of it, which correctly frames the argument not as one of "Instituting a socialist policy when we have none at all" but rather "sliding the slider just a little bit further in one direction or another" along the continuum.

And while I have not read the chapter yet (I will do so when I'm not at work), I suspect that the core use of liberal and conservative is actually the same, it's just what each represents.

Liberalism is about change, working to make things "better" (define "better" however you like). Conservatism is about steady state. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". I've often thought of it in terms of the old Casey Kasem signoff on "American Top 40". Conservatism is "Keep your feet on the ground" and Liberalism is "Keep reaching for the stars."

So, if you're in a country with predominantly socialist policies, the conservative viewpoint will be to keep the socialism and perhaps double down on it as "it's working, so let's keep it" while the liberal view will be "Here are the ways it's not working, and we think things could be better if we did away with it".

Whereas in a country with (as they define it) "NO" socialism, of course the roles of the Conservative and the Liberal with respect to socialism would of necessity be reversed, in order to keep true to the core functions of each.

Friday, November 09, 2012 11:21:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

Career Education