A place for Liam to post essays, comments, diatribes and rants on life in general.

Those fond of Liam's humor essays, they have been moved here.

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Still Think The Bailout Was A Good Idea?

Here is an article in the Guardian (U.K.) pointing out that AIG, the Insurance giant which received an $85 billion emergency bail-out loan from the Government a few days before the major bailout bill that we've talked about was passed, followed that up several days later by spending over $400,000 on a "lavish corporate retreat".

There have been other stories that some of the financial institutions which were pushing so hard for the $700 billion bailout package last week were busy at the same time shoring up their own "golden parachutes", making payments to, or arrangements for such payments to, senior management members.

Now let's just think about this. If you or I got hired to work for a company and completely screwed up everything we worked on, we'd be shown the door, most likely with no severance package at all. But these people at the top, who clearly were at the helm when the ship struck the reef, are being rewarded.

It makes me want to scream!

Liam.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Weren't there provisions in the bill to prevent those golden parachutes, etc.? Or did the provisions apply only to certain bailout situations? Was AIG in violation of the bailout? If yes, then the Secretary should be in hot water for this one.

Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:58:00 AM

 
Blogger Liam said...

I BELIEVE (and I'm not positive) that AIG is not technically in violation, but it's pretty bad form to say you're in dire straits and vitally need taxpayer money to bail you out and then be seen not to have first pared down every bit of non-vital spending.

As to the golden parachutes, I believe they specifically said that they weren't getting involved in contract nullification, which means that anything that was already contractually obligated was still on the table. Which to me seems really stupid, it says "Ok, all of the people who were in charge when the bus drove off of the cliff, they still get their huge rewards, but when we hire a new person to hopefully drive the bus more safely, THAT person won't be eligible for them."

Which, although it sounds good, is likely going to mean that we can't hire the best talent for those banks to turn them around, because like it or not, OTHER companies are still offering those huge parachutes, and so why would a rising star go to a place where he or she could only make $450,000/year with no guaranteed severance package when they could go to a different company and rake in millions with a large guaranteed bonus package.

Liam.

Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:40:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

Career Education